Why down rounds are considered unfavorable 

Down rounds, while not uncommon in the volatile landscape of private company financing, are generally considered unfavorable due to a variety of reasons:

• Dilution for existing shareholders: In a down round, the company typically issues more shares to raise the same amount of capital, leading to increased dilution for existing shareholders. This means that the ownership stake of current investors, including founders and early investors, is reduced, and they own a smaller percentage of the company.
• Signal of financial struggles: A down round can signal financial difficulties or a lack of investor confidence in the company. Investors may interpret it as a red flag, questioning the company’s ability to execute its business plan or achieve growth targets. This perception can make it more challenging for the company to attract future investments.
• Impact on employee morale: Employees often receive stock options or equity as part of their compensation packages. A down round can significantly devalue these equity holdings, which may demoralize and demotivate employees. This can lead to talent retention issues and affect the overall morale and productivity of the team.
• Valuation mark-to-market for future rounds: The valuation established in a down round can serve as a reference point for future fundraising efforts. If subsequent rounds are not able to significantly improve the valuation, it may create a cycle of lower valuations, making it harder for the company to raise capital at favorable terms.

‍

It’s important to note that while a down round is generally perceived negatively, there can be situations where it is a strategic move to ensure the company’s survival or to position itself for future growth.

‍

How a down round may impact the 409A valuation

A down round directly influences the exercise price of future equity grants, so it can have some significant implications for the 409A.  In such cases, clear communication and transparency with stakeholders and employees become crucial to maintaining trust and support. Here’s how a down round may impact the 409A:

• Lower valuation impact: In a down round, the company’s overall valuation decreases. This lower valuation can have a cascading effect on the 409A valuation because the fair market value of the common stock is often tied to recent financing rounds or other relevant financial metrics.
• Impact on stock option exercise price: The 409A valuation plays a crucial role in setting the exercise price for stock options. A lower 409A valuation in a down round means that the exercise price for stock options granted during that period will likely be lower. While this might seem beneficial for employees, it’s important to consider that the IRS requires the exercise price to be at least equal to the fair market value to avoid adverse tax consequences.
• Tax implications for employees: If stock options are granted with an exercise price below the fair market value, as determined by the 409A valuation, employees could face immediate taxation on the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value. This could lead to unintended tax consequences and financial challenges for employees.

It’s crucial for companies to effectively communicate with employees about the impact of a down round on the 409A valuation and the exercise price of stock options. Clear communication helps manage expectations, establishes trust, and enables employees to make informed decisions.

In conclusion 

A down round can lead to a lower 409A valuation, affecting the exercise price of future stock options. This doesn’t usually signal end-of-days for a company, however, it is a situation that should be carefully navigated to ensure proper tax compliance and to foster transparency and trust with employees about the downstream effects on their equity compensation.

‍